At
times we come across some movies that alter the way you perceive life. One such
movie that i happened to view recently is “The Man from Earth”. The movie
essentially resolves around a character that is a college professor and at his
farewell discloses to his fellow professors that he is a 14,000 year old cave
man. Amazed by this “weird” but fascinating confession, his colleagues who hailed
from streams such as biology, history, philosophy, scientology started quizzing
him to verify his claim. However, the beauty and bane of such a claim is that
the part supported by historical data can be assumed to be the obvious truth
and the part not supported by historic data can be assumed to be false. Thus,
the fascinated audience cannot dispute the testimony but simultaneously could
not agree with the same.
However,
considering the impossibility of the story, they decide to continue with it to
kill the otherwise humdrum and the conversation takes an unexpected turn when
it is asked if the character has been a significant religious figure in the
past. Initially reluctant to answer and rightly so considering the audacity of
the answer that followed, the central character finally unveils that he was
Jesus and the religion contours that exist in the present day are not only
starkly different from those intended but are preposterous to say the least. He
discloses how a simple teaching actually developed into a new religion called
as Christianity with a plethora of wrong activities and misinterpretations. He
claims to give a new version of “The Old Testament” in just ten sentences which
essentially actually captured the soul of the religion. Over and above, the
various ceremonies and rituals are just reckless embellishments added to serve
all ulterior motives besides salvation. However, this idea that there present
religion is at best “a grand and ineffective embellishment of the “external
truth” was not acceptable to the people present especially to the scientologists
as surely the idea of God is assumed to be so fundamental to the existence of
the world that it is not even open to a honest reconsideration. So strong was
the reaction against this move that the central character had to eventually
admit that we was lying and trying to fool around.
The
above episode paves way for a more fundamental question with regards to the
need and presence of an eternal truth. Most human beings have this inevitable
need of an eternal truth or belief about which their life evolves. This eternal
truth could be in the form of religion, existence of life in the other world,
existence of a particular relation for lifetime be it our lover, parents,
friends, siblings etc. We all are aware about this fundamental essence of life that
the only constant thing in life is change. While most of us know this, but the
bigger and most pertinent question is whether we mentally are willing to
embrace change and be receptive to the fundamental idea that so called “absolute
and eternal truth” is essentially transient in nature and hence evolutionary. I
strongly believe that, except the obvious facts which are irrefutable, all
others are either opinions or judgments and the element of truthfulness imparted
to these are not intrinsic but rather stems from the intensity of belief with
which one wants to believe in these. An interesting element here is that a
plethora of times (both consciously and unconsciously), the so called eternal
truth more than our belief stems from our deep-rooted need to build our lives
around a static platform which is immortal. Often, we don’t realise it but in
our most testing times we turn to these so called “eternal truths” which
provide solace to out disturbed souls and provide us comfort against suffering.
This “eternal truth” helps in allowing us to make a sense of this chaotic world
which otherwise is perhaps meaningless but our perception essentially
transforms this into a cause and effect relationship.
I wonder
what is so naive or preposterous of this idea that essentially any belief is true only
till the time it seems true and probably there is no eternal truth because of
the intrinsic hollowness of every belief. I believe it allows us to be free and
better embrace the “meaningless” nature of life and enhance adaptability of
life. Let us stop making sense of life as it is or has been or for that matter
will be but start living it completely without prejudice, meaning and fear of
what beholds the future. Unfortunately, we spend so much time making sense of
life as per our eternal truth and framing responses that at times may digress
us from our own self-imposed and must celebrated objectives. It’s high time
that we realise that there is no eternal truth and perhaps its time for us to
be more open, less scared and embrace the fact that there are a zillion
versions of truth as it is a fig of our imagination hence each one of us is equally
correct and equally wrong.
2 comments:
The very fact that you bumped into this feature film is an accomplishment in itself and then you go on further and write some 1000+ words on it is the cherry on the cake. Men who watched 'The Man on Earth' deserve an applause for raising its profile, otherwise it would have ended on some US cable network, hugely under-appreciated.
It is the most beautiful movie I have ever seen in my life..
Post a Comment